ABSTRACT
Este artículo abarca la configuración conceptual del derecho de postulación en Colombia, detallando la amplitud de sus excepciones, donde legal y constitucionalmente se autoriza la intervención directa. Luego de explicar acciones, hipótesis y controversias motivo de excepción;se muestra el esquema de las modalidades del poder en el Código General del Proceso y las vicisitudes de la presentación personal junto con propuestas al respecto;sin olvidar de otro lado, la normatividad para conferir los poderes bajo la emergencia económica, social y ecológica de la pandemia COVID-19. De esta forma, después de emprender un recorrido analítico, se precisa el alcance teórico y la operatividad de los fenómenos de la revocatoria y renuncia del poder, como motivos para la finalización del mismo, a los cuales se agregan, dentro de esta investigación, la muerte del apoderado y dos clases de inhabilidades bautizadas como inhabilidad sobrevenida e inhabilidad originaria, las cuales no constituyen causal de nulidad procesal. La metodología utilizada tuvo por objeto el análisis de normas proferidas antes y después de la Constitución de 1991, de doctrina y de jurisprudencia en las cuales se observan comentarios, críticas y proposiciones, gracias a la simbiosis entre el derecho procesal y el derecho sustancial. This article covers the theoretical concept of the right to nomination in Colombia detailing its many exceptions where direct intervention is authorized both legally and constitutionally. After having explained the legal actions, various hypothesis, and controversies that, in turn, constitute exceptions, the General Code of Procedures framework and the many vicissitudes of the physical appearance, along with proposals in such regard, are shown without forgetting, on the other hand, the statutes by which powers of attorney are to be produced during the current time (COVID-19). In this sense, after an adequate analysis, the theoretical reach, as well as the mechanism of action of the revocation of the power of attorney and its renunciation (causes for termination) are laid out. Among the latter, the death of the lawyer representing his or her client and two kinds of legal incompetence known as: «sudden incompetence» (fortuitous) and «original incompetence» (by nature), which do not constitute cause for procedural nullity. The methodology by which this article was written had the very intention of analyzing the statutes set forth before and after the 1991 Constitution, and before and after the doctrine (jurists) and case law;statutes in which comments, critics, and propositions are observed due to the existing "symbiosis" between Procedural Law and Positive Law.Alternate :This article covers the theoretical concept of the right to nomination in Colombia detailing its many exceptions where direct intervention is authorized both legally and constitutionally. After having explained the legal actions, various hypothesis, and controversies that, in turn, constitute exceptions, the General Code of Procedures framework and the many vicissitudes of the physical appearance, along with proposals in such regard, are shown without forgetting, on the other hand, the statutes by which powers of attorney are to be produced during the current time (COVID-19). In this sense, after an adequate analysis, the theoretical reach, as well as the mechanism of action of the revocation of the power of attorney and its renunciation (causes for termination) are laid out. Among the latter, the death of the lawyer representing his or her client and two kinds of legal incompetence known as: «sudden incompetence» (fortuitous) and «original incompetence» (by nature), which do not constitute cause for procedural nullity. The methodology by which this article was written had the very intention of analyzing the statutes set forth before and after the 1991 Constitution, and before and after the doctrine (jurists) and case law;statutes in which comments, critics, and propositions are observed due to the existing "symbiosis" betwee Procedural Law and Positive Law.
ABSTRACT
Just like your phone can detect what song is playing in crowded spaces, we show that Artificial Intelligence transfer learning algorithms trained on cough phone recordings results in diagnostic tests for COVID-19. To gain adoption by the health care community, we plan to validate our results in a clinical trial and three other venues in Mexico, Spain and the USA . However, if we had data from other on-going clinical trials and volunteers, we may do much more. For example, for confirmed stay-at-home COVID-19 patients, a longitudinal audio test could be developed to determine contact-with-hospital recommendations, and for the most critical COVID-19 patients a success ratio forecast test, including patient clinical data, to prioritize ICU allocation. As a challenge to the engineering community and in the context of our clinical trial, the authors suggest distributing cough recordings daily, hoping other trials and crowdsourcing users will contribute more data. Previous approaches to complex AI tasks have either used a static dataset or were private efforts led by large corporations. All existing COVID-19 trials published also follow this paradigm. Instead, we suggest a novel open collective approach to large-scale real-time health care AI. We will be posting updates at https://opensigma.mit.edu. Our personal view is that our approach is the right one for large scale pandemics, and therefore is here to stay - will you join?